Adlavik Islands
A joint initiative by the Smithsonian Institution and the Robert S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology in Andover, Massachusetts, in collaboration with the community of Makkovik (including the Jens [John Christian] Erhardt School and the Makkovik Historical Society) was launched during the summer of 1999. From its inception, the project was designed specifically as a community archaeology project whose avowed goals include working with the community to develop a program on archaeology in the local school curriculum; providing training and employment opportunities; identifying archaeological and historical resources in the vicinity of the community and to advance the heritage appreciation and awareness of tourism opportunities; and fostering pride in Labrador culture and heritage.
The goals of the 1999 fieldwork included determining the community's interest in supporting a cooperative archaeological program associated with the J.C. Erhardt school, and assessing the viability of a site at Adlavik Harbour, about 35 kms east of the village. The 1999 fieldwork was conducted under a research permit issued by the Newfoundland-Labrador Division of Culture, Tourism and Recreation. It was supported by the Arctic Studies Center, the Robert S. Peabody Museum, Brown University, the community of Makkovik, the Makkovik Historical Society and by a generous grant from the Quebec-Labrador Foundation. The student team from Makkovik - Bernie Andersen, Errol Andersen, Tracy-Ann Evans, Amalia [Tuglavina], and Lena Onalik - proved to be exceptionally dedicated, hard-working and imaginative.
The remains of three large rectangular sod-wall structures were discovered at Adlavik Harbour in 1987 during a Smithsonian reconnaissance. Along with the famous site at Eskimo Island in the Narrows of Hamilton Inlet, the Adlavik Harbour site appears to be one of the southernmost Eskimo settlements in Labrador. Research here is expected to contribute tremendously to an understanding of Labrador Eskimo culture history. The size of these structures suggested that they are the remains of Inuit communal houses dating to sometime in the late-17th or early-18th century, a time when Inuit groups in Labrador were coalescing around prominent native leaders. It was a time of tremendous social change as Inuit families sought prestige and power through increased interactions with Europeans, interaction that ran the spectrum from trading to warfare to outright murder.
We hoped the 1999 field work would enable us to determine the rough chronology of the site and acquire information about the extent of cultural deposits and their preservation at the site so that we would be able to determine how an archaeology program for high school students could be planned and developed. Fieldwork was conducted between August fourteenth and the twenty-second.
The remains of three large rectangular sod-wall structures were discovered at Adlavik Harbour in 1987 during a Smithsonian reconnaissance. Along with the famous site at Eskimo Island in the Narrows of Hamilton Inlet, the Adlavik Harbour site appears to be one of the southernmost Eskimo settlements in Labrador. Research here is expected to contribute tremendously to an understanding of Labrador Eskimo culture history. The size of these structures suggested that they are the remains of Inuit communal houses dating to sometime in the late-17th or early-18th century, a time when Inuit groups in Labrador were coalescing around prominent native leaders. It was a time of tremendous social change as Inuit families sought prestige and power through increased interactions with Europeans, interaction that ran the spectrum from trading to warfare to outright murder.
We hoped the 1999 field work would enable us to determine the rough chronology of the site and acquire information about the extent of cultural deposits and their preservation at the site so that we would be able to determine how an archaeology program for high school students could be planned and developed. Fieldwork was conducted between August fourteenth and the twenty-second.
The sod-house structures at Adlavik Harbour are nestled beneath a high bedrock knoll that hides the site from view by travelers working their way along the Labrador coast. We suspect that this defensive attribute of the site's situation is not fortuitous, but reflects the pervasive climate of social unrest, a consequence of the incessant internecine raiding and trading that characterized 17-18th century relations between the Inuit and the expanding European presence along the south and central Labrador coasts.
Test units were placed in the interior of House-1 and House-2 with more or less similar results. They demonstrated that the structures were both exceptionally well-preserved and undisturbed, with features including paved floors, sleeping platforms, lamp stands, storage alcoves, etc., which upon completion of excavations would present striking and dramatic examples of 18th century Labrador Inuit winter dwelling.
A two-meter long test-excavation unit was placed in the midden in front of House-1, just beyond the beginning of the entrance passage. The loamy organic midden soil proved to be almost 40cm deep and full of refuse bone and wood demonstrating the presence of an intact stratified deposit with exceptional preservation.
The midden contains a promising array of artifactual remains from both domestic and subsistence contexts, indicative of both traditional Inuit tools and technologies (especially harpoon technology and fragments of soapstone kettles) and new tool forms (harpoons made of iron, European iron pots) and raw materials (iron nails, spikes, bolts and scrap). A few European ceramic shreds were recovered including grey stoneware and delft-ware. Preliminary analysis supports the interpretation that the site was occupied sometime between ca. AD 1680 and 1750.
While middens are usually interpreted as areas of refuse accumulation, their proximity to houses means that certain activities including wood cutting, animal butchery, tool manufacture, maintenance of dog teams and storage facilities must have occurred on or in close vicinity to the midden. Just one example of these sorts of activities is indicated by the large whale vertebra that was found that had been used as an anvil in the production of tools and for splitting wood. A test-pit in the entrance passage for House-2 produced not only iron scraps and many nails and rivets but also the neck and upper portion of a large green glass bottle of late 17th century English style. The bottle fragments may attest to Inuit interest in glass as a raw material or perhaps in the wine contents. The glass may be the remains of scavenged objects found at European sites, or a bottle that washed ashore to the astonishment of the Inuit--as attested to in a delightful story recorded by Junius Bird (Archaeology of the Hopedale Region, 1945:163).
In this original (1934) pre-play of the Gods Must be Crazy, Bird's Inuit assistant Heinrich Ursak, commented on similar bottle fragments recovered from the Hopedale sod-houses, recounted a song he knew about the discovery of the first glass bottle even seen by an Inuk! This is a remarkable example of the tenacity of oral history since the event, according to Mr. Ursak, had happened prior to the arrival of the Moravians at Hopedale in 1781. The story even included the fact that the bottle was round-bottomed and would not stand upright, a description that fits what we know about many 18th century bottles like the one recovered at Adlavik.
The general paucity of European manufactured products at Adlavik Harbour - with the significant exception of iron (iron nails, spikes, bolts and scrap) - suggests that the assemblage of European objects and materials was derived from Inuit raids or scavenging expeditions to southern Labrador. The site location itself implies both a need to monitor the coming and going of groups (Inuit and Europeans alike) along the central coast and perhaps, fear of retaliation, given its hidden, defensive position.
However exciting the archaeology and the history of Labrador's indigenous Indian and Inuit populations are, much of the results of this research are unknown to Labrador communities. Until recently few First Nations individuals have been involved in more than a cursory fashion in archaeological projects addressing their own history. The primary goal of our project is to address this problem and to make archaeology an intimate feature of coastal Labrador communities. We believe that the project will contribute significantly to an awareness of the deep historical roots of the community and serve as a source of local pride for young people and a model for projects in other Labrador communities.
Both the Arctic Studies Center and the Robert S. Peabody Museum for Archaeology believe that community based research is the future of archaeology in Labrador. The project is committed to careful exploration and development of Labrador's heritage resources and to make opportunities available to young people from Labrador communities. The future of the past in Labrador belongs to Labradorians. Our research seeks to develop new ways to involve student, community members and political leadership in the production of Labrador history.
Evidence of our success is noted in comments from the student evaluations:
When I found out that I was going on this trip, I was very happy for many reasons. One was to learn about the way the Inuit lived and to go back to the place where I fished with my uncle who passed away, so it was good to be back there and to see what archaeology is like. - Errol Andersen
Overall this was one of the most boring, but most interesting things I have ever been on. I have learned a lot about the past life of my ancestors and how important archaeology really is. - Tracy-Ann Evans
As I sit here and collect my thoughts of the past week, I realize I've learned so much about the way our ancestors lived and it makes me feel proud that I could learn more about our culture from this expedition. - Lena Onalik
Essay on Experiences at Adlavik Islands Archaeological Dig - By Erin Andersen
Nisbet Harbour Dig
Evidence of our success is noted in comments from the student evaluations:
When I found out that I was going on this trip, I was very happy for many reasons. One was to learn about the way the Inuit lived and to go back to the place where I fished with my uncle who passed away, so it was good to be back there and to see what archaeology is like. - Errol Andersen
Overall this was one of the most boring, but most interesting things I have ever been on. I have learned a lot about the past life of my ancestors and how important archaeology really is. - Tracy-Ann Evans
As I sit here and collect my thoughts of the past week, I realize I've learned so much about the way our ancestors lived and it makes me feel proud that I could learn more about our culture from this expedition. - Lena Onalik
Essay on Experiences at Adlavik Islands Archaeological Dig - By Erin Andersen
Nisbet Harbour Dig